A new report published by the United Nations Environment Programme has found that Australia is at the bottom of the list for directing post-coved 19 economic stimulus towards clean, rather than polluting, options.
The Global Recovery Observatory is an initiative led by the Oxford University Economic Recovery Project (OUERP) and supported by UNEP, the International Monetary Fund and GIZ through the Green Fiscal Policy Network (GFPN), and has been tracking the policies of the world’s 50 largest economies.
Australia’s stimulus investment have been large in scale relative to GDP, but almost entirely directed towards less green alternatives. Only South Korea, Spain and the United Kingdom had higher spending, but Australia ranks lowest on the % of total recovery spending directed towards green options.
“To the question, “Are we building back better?” the answer is: not yet. The spending announced in 2020 paints a disappointing picture for overall efforts thus far to build forward with green priorities”, wrote UNEP, in the report.
The project tracks spending on green projects such as renewable energy, transmission projects, battery storage, electric vehicles, active transport and energy efficient / green homes. Australia ranks weakly in all these categories, with most spending directed towards healthcare investment. Australia’s gas-fired recovery ranks particularly low, with the group assigning it a net negative impact on environment and human health.
Of the global data, $66.1bn was invested in low carbon energy, thanks to Spanish and German subsidies for renewable energy projects and hydrogen and infrastructure investments. $86.1billion was announced for green transport through EV transfers and subsidies, investments in public transport and cycling and walking infrastructure.
Professor of Environmental Economics at Oxford, Cameron Hepburn: “This report is a wake-up call. The data from the Global Recovery Observatory show that we are not building back better, at least not yet. We know a green recovery would be a win for the economy as well as the climate – now we need to get on with it.”
